Vol. I · Tuesday, July 28, 2026 RSS  ·  Search  ·  About

News and primary-source research on the Watchtower organization

Religious freedom

Topic
Sort
D.D.C. No. 24-cv-02523Confirmed

Judge revives Watch Tower's suit over Russia's seizure of the Witnesses' St Petersburg headquarters

Illustration: a sealed, undelivered envelope resting on a rolled property deed beside a ring of keys

A federal judge in Washington threw the case out in September 2025 — not on its merits, but because the lawsuit papers had never been validly delivered. On 23 July 2026 he undid that dismissal, giving the Jehovah's Witnesses' Pennsylvania corporation 180 days to serve the Russian Federation, its health ministry and the state institute now using the site, this time through diplomatic channels. Documents filed with the complaint valued the property at more than $30 million. As of that opinion the court had decided nothing about whether a U.S. court can hear the claim at all.

D.N.J. No. 25-cv-01459Confirmed

UPDATE: Jehovah's Witnesses drop their appeal in a 1999 New Jersey tax-deal fight, leaving the federal dismissal to stand

Illustration: a sealed contract on a municipal ledger beneath scales whose pans are two courthouse doorways

A federal judge dismissed the congregation's bid to escape a 1999 payment-in-lieu-of-taxes deal on its Turnersville assembly hall, ruling only that a federal court is the wrong forum — she decided nothing about whether the hall is tax-exempt. The congregation appealed, then dropped the appeal on 21 July 2026, the day its opening brief was due, leaving that dismissal to stand.

UN Working Group on Arbitrary DetentionConfirmed

UN Working Group Finds Detention of 26 Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia Arbitrary, Calls for Immediate Release

Illustration: a sealed international document beside a small barred window and a register of twenty-six marks

Opinion No. 30/2026 finds the detentions arbitrary under categories I, II and V and recommends release plus compensation. Russia responded nine days after the deadline, citing the extremism designation; the panel could not accept the reply as timely. The opinion is not binding, and the Working Group made no finding of torture or unfair trial.

The Swedish thread mirrors Norway's: whether a state may withhold public funding from a religious group over its internal membership and shunning practices.Confirmed

Sweden Denies Jehovah's Witnesses State Subsidies, Then a Court Orders Them Restored

Illustration: scales of justice beside a grant document and coins

Sweden's Agency for Support to Faith Communities (SST) ruled on 24 October 2025 that Jehovah's Witnesses failed new 'democracy conditions' for state grants, citing shunning and membership limits. On 7 May 2026 the Stockholm Administrative Court overturned the denial and ordered the grant restored; the agency has appealed.

A duty judge authorized transfusions on the basis of a fax the Court found 'very limited, incorrect and incomplete.'Confirmed

European Court Rules Spain Violated Jehovah's Witness's Rights Over Forced Blood Transfusions

Illustration: scales of justice, an IV blood bag and a legal directive

In Pindo Mulla v. Spain, the ECHR Grand Chamber unanimously found that Spain breached Rosa Edelmira Pindo Mulla's rights when a duty judge authorized three transfusions during emergency surgery despite her advance written refusals. The Court faulted the decision-making process, not the doctors' medical judgment.

RulingConfirmed

Norway's Supreme Court ended a years-long fight over Jehovah's Witnesses' funding and shunning

Illustration: scales of justice and a sealed court document

In April 2026 Norway's highest court ruled the state acted unlawfully when it deregistered Jehovah's Witnesses and cut their funding over shunning. The justices were unanimous that the state had not shown harm to children — and split only on a separate question about adults. It was the end of a five-year fight, and part of a wider European reckoning.

Religious freedomConfirmed

Russia declared Jehovah's Witnesses "extremist" in 2017. Here's what the ban did.

Illustration: a gavel and padlock over a document and a domed skyline

A 2017 Supreme Court ruling outlawed the organization nationwide, liquidated 395 local entities, and seized property — without a single finding of violence. Europe's top human-rights court later called the whole campaign unlawful, but Russia, by then out of the Council of Europe, refused to comply.