|
Letter
of Disassociation Dear Friends, The purpose of this letter is to offer some sort of explanation to friends and people that were special to me over the years. When someone leaves the “truth”, rumor and gossip generally abound. The question “why?” naturally goes through people’s minds.
There
were many that could say they knew me, but few who really understood me.
Most I’m sure in simple conversation would discern that I am a person
of principle, and nothing was more important to me than the truth. I assure
you that I am still the same person, the words of this letter confirm
this, and I assure you that the words written are my own. While I am aware
of the fragile nature of the human mind, I am confident that the decisions
I have made and the statements here written have been done so with me
being of sound mind. It is not my intention to change, or condemn anyone’s
beliefs and convictions, just to convey accurate personal information
in what is likely to be a time of gossip and speculation regarding myself.
I have included supplemental information with this letter, most of it
being quotes from the Society’s own publications which I believe support
the stand that I have taken. Please feel free to verify the accuracy of
such quotes. Supplemental information which is Biblically supported, but
may present contrary views to the Society is clearly identified and is
separate from the rest, to allow the reader to discard such material if
he should choose to do so. Please bear with the letter, as it is somewhat
lengthy, (perhaps have a drink of tea while you read A man’s conscience is a powerful thing. Moral dilemmas require us many times in our life to make decisions based on conscience. Sometimes these dilemmas go right to the foundation of who we are and what we stand for. A person can be ripped in two, completely torn between what he knows is right, and what he wants to believe is right. These decisions can carry heavy consequences. They reveal what sort of persons we are, and the principles that we live by. To be loyal to God and one’s conscience no matter what the price paid is what true Christianity is all about. It is such a crisis that I have endured the past while. The sleepless nights spent in prayer, the days spent in physical sickness over the matter. As someone who has been “in the truth” his whole life, baptized at the age of 14, what could be at the heart of who I am and what I stand for more than my beliefs as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Herein lies the crisis, in that what goes even deeper than my beliefs as a Witness is my love of Jehovah, Christ, and his Word. Being a Witness “requires accepting the entire range of the true teachings of the Bible, including those Scriptural beliefs that are unique to Jehovah’s Witnesses.” (Watchtower 1986 4/1 30-1) [Emphasis mine]. Many Witnesses feel that while they accept most of the organization’s teachings, they can “pick and choose” which ones they want to really believe. While I know this reasoning is widespread, I also know that from the organization’s view, such reasoning is not acceptable. When a person has difficulties accepting and proclaiming certain major teachings, as set forth in the Watchtower, and he just can’t get beyond it, he becomes liable for disfellowshipment. This is where it has become difficult for me. How can one in good conscience believe and teach things that they cannot reconcile with scripture? It not possible for me (as well as many others) to believe and to teach, as stated in the September 1, 1989 Watchtower page 19, that “Only Jehovah's Witnesses, those of the anointed remnant and the "great crowd," as a united organization under the protection of the Supreme Organizer, have any Scriptural hope of surviving the impending end of this doomed system dominated by Satan the Devil.” [Emphasis mine] The claim that “everyone will be destroyed” who is not associated with God’s “spirit-directed” organization, his sole “channel” for dispensing “spiritual food” and “new light” to mankind greatly troubles me. It troubles me, not because imperfect men with good intentions can’t make honest errors, but that when such claim to be led by, and following God’s perfect spirit, as his exclusive “channel” or “mouthpiece”, when individuals must accept whatever teachings come from that “channel” as from God, there is absolutely no room for error. To make such claims, then require millions of members to believe and teach such doctrines and predictions as “truth”, however sincere, then reverse our understanding claiming “new light” makes God’s direction and spirit appear less than perfect. Either the direction from God’s spirit is imperfect, or men are resisting the spirit by going ahead of what God has revealed by means of it. This is either blasphemy or apostasy, and I can have no part in it. I understand the “light getting brighter” concept, as set forth on page 10 of the March 15, 2000, Watchtower. I also see it as Charles Russell did when he wrote that new light does not contradict old light.
The reality is that we have a history of “new light” contradicting “old light”. Instead of saying something like “we really don’t know at the present time and cannot comment with certainty on the matter” or “it is wise not to speculate regarding such and such”, the Society has made dogmatic statements, statements which had to be accepted and taught by members, which were later shown to be in gross error. A simple example of this is with regard to whether the people of Sodom and Gomorrah will receive a resurrection. In my opinion, whether these people would receive a resurrection or not is a non-issue, but the Society obviously felt they had an obligation to shed some “light” on the matter. The Watchtower of 7/1879 p 8 says the Sodomites will be resurrected. The Watchtower of 6/1/52 p 338 says the men of Sodom will not be resurrected. The Watchtower of 8/1/65 p 479 says the men of Sodom will be resurrected. The Watchtower of 6/1/1988 p 31 says men of Sodom will not be resurrected. Live forever 1982 edition says men of Sodom will be resurrected. Live forever 1989 version says Men of Sodom will not be resurrected. Statements in both versions are found on page 179. Insight Vol. 2 page 985 says men of Sodom will be resurrected. Revelation book page 273 says the men of Sodom will not be resurrected. This sort of “light” is not like the gradual increase in understanding and clarifying of viewpoint as one would expect when a “sunrise” occurs on the “path of the righteous ones.” Rather, it is much more like the ever changing “light” from a traffic signal. This sort of “yes/no” light is very confusing for the members as they start to wonder what they even believe. This is shown by a 1970 Awake article, April 22 page 8, which quotes a Catholic disillusioned because his church had some “new light” regarding the eating of meat on Friday.
Certainly these comments are much more relevant to Jehovah’s Witnesses, than to any Catholic. (Consider “changing light” on matters of Blood Fractions, Homosexuality/bestiality and Divorce, Organ Transplants, “Generation”, time for judging of the “sheep and the goats”, education) Perhaps, few things characterize the organization’s history more than our passion for dates and “predictions” regarding when the “end” will come. Few Witnesses are aware of just how many dates and predictions were originated from God’s spirit-directed “Channel.” Those who do generally pass it off as Bible Students or Witnesses in general reading “a little too much into Watchtower articles” or being a little too “overzealous” to see the “end” come. Was that really the case? The Proclaimers book on page 632 fully acknowledges the dates: 1874, 1878, 1881, 1914, 1915, 1925. However, missing are the quotes from the Watchtower showing the definiteness and certainty with which such predictions were made. These quotes have been included in the supplemental information included with this letter. As an example of how Witnesses in the year 2000 generally misunderstand the events in their earlier history notice this familiar comment regarding that “memorable” convention in Cedar Point Ohio in 1922, as stated in the February 1, 2000 Watchtower on page 14:
Other than a few lines from one of Brother Rutherford’s talks, Witnesses in general know nothing more from that nine-day “landmark convention.” The following Watchtower quotes fill in just exactly what regarding the Kingdom they were “advertising.” Notice in particular when in 1922 they believed Christ’s presence began, and what they were so eager to “advertise.” These important facts are rarely mentioned in connection with this “landmark convention.”
What the message of the time really was, was that “the Lord Jesus is present and has been since 1874.” The Bible Students were “eager” to “advertise” because they believed, or more correctly, were led to believe that the Scriptures indicated that “Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Daniel, and those other men of old come forth in the glory of their better resurrection,” and that some faithful Christians might receive their heavenly reward just a few short years away in 1925. (See also Proclaimers book page 78, paragraph 2 for further confirmation of these facts.) So, when these events failed to materialize, what did the Society do? Did they humbly apologize for their “over-zealousness” and acknowledge their responsibility for leading the “flock” to an erroneous conclusion? Let us look at the facts.
Of course, having looked at the original quotes, we now understand that the “Some” who “anticipated the work would end in 1925,” was really the Society who had lead the brothers to that conclusion. Contrast the statement “but the Lord did not state so,” with what they said earlier in 1922:
The Society put the blame on the members when they stated that “the friends inflated their imaginations beyond reason; and that when their imaginations burst asunder, they were inclined to throw away everything." [Emphasis mine] Hopefully the Society has progressed, and learned much since then, or have they? This brings us to the date 1975. Many were in the truth at that time, but most today were not. Was 1975 another date with which “the friends inflated their imaginations beyond reason?”
Notice how the Truth book (as published prior to 1975), the primary study aid at the time, subtly highlights 1975 in the mind of the student and teacher.
Even the Society recognized the leading nature of their remarks because the Truth book published after 1975 reads like this:
Local Witnesses who were in the truth at the time remember heavy emphasis given from the platform at conventions and assemblies and in the Kingdom Halls regarding 1975. Statistics showed explosive growth in the years prior to 1975 giving evidence that the Society was aware of the “positive” effect of all the talk regarding 1975. Anyone who did not express confidence that the end was coming in 1975 would have been labeled “weak.” Many sold their homes and pioneered in the months before 1975. How did the society feel about these actions? Did they encourage caution?
While I was born in 1974, I know from talking with Witnesses who lived through those years that the prevailing attitude during the years prior to 1975 was one of eager anticipation for the year 1975. Anyone who has been a Witness for some time is well aware that “new ideas” or “thoughts” never originate nor are permitted at the “local level,” and that no Witness would have come up with 1975 without having been led to that conclusion by means of printed publications and talks by Circuit and District Overseers. So did the Society humbly acknowledge their responsibility in leading the members to yet another wrong date? Did they apologize for failing to encourage caution among the brothers?
If this language seems familiar, then it probably is. Its very reminiscent of the language used when 1925 came and went. “But it is not advisable for us to set our sights on a certain date.” Where was this caution prior to 1975? “If anyone has been disappointed through not following this line of thought, he should now concentrate on adjusting his viewpoint.” It is made to appear that the Witness was following some other line of thought other than that, which was set forth by the Society. Remember, a “good” Witness was following the “line of thought” as set forth in this Kingdom Service quote from 1974 as stated earlier: “Reports are heard of brothers selling their homes and property and planning to finish out the rest of their days in this old system in the pioneer service. Certainly this is a fine way to spend the short time remaining before the wicked world’s end.-1 John 2:17.” “It was not the word of God that failed or deceived him and brought disappointment.” Certainly it wasn’t the Word of God. Its quite apparent who it was that “deceived and brought disappointment.” But once again, where was the blame put? “His own understanding was based on wrong premises.” Yes, once again, the blame was put on the individual. He had somehow reached a wrong understanding. Most Witnesses today will still believe that they somehow read more into things than what was said or stated, and that the Society was not at fault in any way for its members looking to 1975. In all fairness, the Society did acknowledge some responsibility for 1975, five years later in the March 15, 1980 Watchtower.
Such acknowledgment proved to be too little too late, as tens of thousands left the organization. Not necessarily because they were somehow “unfaithful to God”, or “serving for a date.” No, many realized that claim that the organization was “directed by God’s Spirit” was inconsistent with its history of failed predictions. Why would God use false predictions to somehow “test and sift” his followers? Every prediction regarding a date had not materialized. And every time a date failed, blame was put on the members. Even after the 1980 acknowledgment by the Society of their role in the 1975 prediction, 15 years later in 1995 they would pass off responsibility once again on the members.
Again the details omitted are that the “many Witnesses” who “conjectured… Christ’s Millennial Reign might start to take place in 1975”, based such “conjecture” on the Society’s “understanding that the seventh millennium of human history would begin then.” As mentioned previously, these understandings were set forth in the book Life Everlasting-in Freedom of the Sons of God, and the August 15, 1968 Watchtower article entitled “Why Are You Looking Forward to 1975?” As for the Society’s use of the word “conjectured”, it is embarrassingly accurate when it comes to Watch Tower Society “predictions” in light of the definition according to Webster’s Dictionary.
After 1975 failed, renewed emphasis was placed on the “generation” that saw 1914 as “the generation that would not pass away” before the “conclusion of this system of things.” While not a date, it certainly afforded most of us an opportunity to “calculate” just how long these ones could live and feel quite confident that the “end was just around the corner.” The Society provided no shortage of comments on the subject.
As the year 1994 arrived, many became “concerned” as the time period for a “biblical generation” of 80 years had elapsed since 1914. Right on time, a new “generation” understanding followed in 1995.
And same as every other time before, the Society put the blame on the members for “speculating.”
Even as late as this year, the Society still continues to make statements that would encourage members to “speculate” to maintain a “sense of urgency” among Witnesses. The January 15, 2000 Watchtower page 13, paragraph 18 states:
This can only encourage a “generation style” speculating among Jehovah’s Witnesses, with the members “calculating” just how long these “genuine anointed” (generally thought to be those chosen prior to 1935) can live. Most likely, if history hold’s true, there will be disappointment, “new light,” and blame put on the brothers and sisters for “speculating”. An individual once asked “is not the average Witness expelled for apostasy for “running ahead of Jehovah,” “not waiting on Jehovah,” and “thinking independently of Jehovah?” Who has done these things?
In light of all the forgoing, how can this statement be made in good conscience by the Faithful and Discreet Slave?
” Witnesses will say that they do not claim to be infallible “prophets.” The record shows the Society do claim to be prophets and Witnesses must accept “present truths” as though they are infallible, or be disfellowshipped. Consider these Watchtower quotes.
Such behavior is sadly reminiscent of Jehovah’s words in Jeremiah. *** Rbi8 Jeremiah 23:21 *** 21 “I did not send the prophets, yet they themselves ran. I did not speak to them, yet they themselves prophesied. Unfortunately, the statistics show the result of such “overzealous” prophesying. Nearly every country with a long established history with the Organization shows a decrease in publishers. While many have left for selfish reasons, or to pursue a course not in harmony with the Scriptures, many have left on grounds of conscience and principle. In addition to the serious questions raised because of the Society’s past, many are troubled at the current state many congregations find themselves in. Of special concern are the youth. It is with great sadness that for the most part, a whole generation of young ones has been lost. They have been lost because they never gained an appreciation for what spiritual things really were. For them, spirituality was simply measured in hours, and worship was simply meetings and service, no personal relationship with God. The Circuit Overseer always spoke about hospitality nearly every visit, but few things for the teenagers ever materialized. Many are going to nightclubs in the city at least on a casual basis, and there is enough drug (ecstasy and marijuana) use, alcohol abuse, oral sex, fornication and smoking to be concerned about. While I believe that all, including these ones must take responsibility for their actions, much more could have been done to help them see the value of spiritual things. It will take much more than a video to reach their hearts. The adults in the truth are not faring any better. The incidence of marriage break-ups in the truth has skyrocketed, leaving many single parents in the congregations. Shameful conduct is taking place on an unprecedented scale. What people watch on TV and in movies today, would have gotten them disfellowshipped 15 years ago. Profanity and obscene language is common from the youngest children right up to “responsible” elders. Discouragement and disillusionment, as well as “Witness” illnesses such as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromialgia, depression, and burnout are everywhere. Many elders (not necessarily those in this congregation) have mentioned the heavy load they are carrying these days on top of daily responsibilities. Many are concerned with the lack of time they have to genuinely care for their families as well as the flock. There simply is not enough time to get to know them as friends, and visit them as loving shepherds. Too much time has been “eaten up” by organizational routine. Perhaps if more time were spent shepherding, less time would be spent in judicial committees. While Circuit Overseers have repeatedly encouraged elders to “counsel one another,” elder’s admit that this is rarely done, despite concerns by individual elders at the way things handled sometimes. Everyone always wants to “do more.” The simple fact is that people will never be able to do enough. Donations are down, meeting attendance is down, and field service has been reduced to a mere ritual. Witnesses have equated love with “hours”, and God’s blessing with “figures”. The bible is rarely used in the ministry, and few people, despite billions of hours being spent in the work are aware of even the basics of our message. I know well, that many Witnesses can’t explain their own beliefs scripturally. Quite simply its because they rarely read their own Bibles. How will God judge people on a message that many Witnesses themselves are unaware of? How can we draw new ones to God’s “clean organization” when unclean conduct has permeated it? Despite claiming love and happiness, most Witnesses are well aware that, for the most part, such claims are hollow. Instead, there is competition, judging one another, self-righteousness. My mind and spirit simply cannot endure such conduct taking place among those claiming to be “God’s clean people.” And while the “official” line is that there is a “sifting work” taking place, the reality is that many others cannot tolerate such conduct taking place by those claiming to be “God’s chosen people”. We like to compare ourselves with God’s chosen nation Israel, and the first century Christian congregation. Unfortunately Israel apostatized and was rejected by God. Their spiritual leaders were more concerned with ritual and tradition, than they were concerned about people. Wicked acts and sins permeated “God’s organization”. The first century Christian congregation fared no better. The Corinthian congregation was tolerating loose conduct and Christ gave severe counsel to 5 out of 7 of the congregations in Revelation. Eventually they too apostatized from the pure teachings of the Christ. Of course, we’d like to apply ourselves to “Israel” and the “Christian congregation” when they are spoken of favorably, then revert back to comparing them to Christendom when the scriptures place them in a bad light. This double standard, one for Christendom and one for us is dishonest. As I have shown, we cannot “gloat”, and point out as evidence of God’s disfavor with Christendom when Her churches experience declines in numbers, when their young people are messed up, when their members are disillusioned, when they make mistakes, because all these things are happening to us. If we claim “God’s blessing” upon us when “people are flocking to God’s organization,” a decrease then, means a lack of God’s blessing, not a “sifting work.” The scriptures warn of a Great Apostasy in the last days, and I believe it is fully manifest among “God’s people” as well. No one is getting a “free ride” to “Paradise”. No man-made organization can provide salvation to anyone. Only by God’s undeserved kindness and by faith in Christ’s ransom sacrifice can one gain eternal life. This statement is in harmony with the following Watchtower comments.
People say “Wait on Jehovah.” “These things only show just how close we are to the end.” While I do believe that we are in the “last days” and “close to the end” for that matter, I cannot see God making sweeping changes to a religion that clearly did not originate with him. Such reasoning would be like a Catholic waiting on God to reform his church. At some point one must realize that however sincere adherents and leaders are to their beliefs, false religion is false religion.
The question has been raised by many, “where are you going to go?” Herein lies the misconception. Those who feel they require an organization for salvation feel, that the one leaving must be going to some other organization. “How will you be saved without being associated with “God’s organization?” The truth of the matter is that I too, answer as Peter did when he said “Lord, whom shall we go away to? You have sayings of everlasting life.” I feel no need to make the same mistake twice and go anywhere other than to God’s word and the clear, simple teachings of Christ Jesus. Along these lines, its interesting what Charles Russell wrote in 1895:
Its interesting that Russell recognized the pitfalls of human organizations claiming “divine authority.” He also made this statement:
The fact of the matter is that I have never considered my “salvation” of great importance anyway. I can only do my best to serve God as a Christian. The rest remains in his hands. No works can earn eternal life, but rather it is only by His mercy and undeserved kindness, and by faith in the ransom sacrifice of His Son. If only I am privileged to serve Him in this life only, I consider it no loss, as I simply see no better way to live.
In the end, having association with a particular organization will save no one. We all will be judged as individuals and we will all stand alone on that day. I stand alone with my faith in God today. A friend once told me, that he feared that the “organization had become too organized.” I too feel that it has become a cold machine. An abstract concept held together by the dreams and imaginations of well-intentioned members, but with no real heart, no love. The focus of everything is the ministry. We go to meetings/assemblies/conventions to be told to go in service. Every article in the magazines highlights the preaching work. When a loved one dies, or you feel depressed, or you lack joy, the answer is simple. “Go out in service more.” While the ministry is important, is it so important that we spend a billion hours to the neglect of our young ones, our families, the sick and elderly? Does it make sense to go looking for new “disciples”, when so many are leaving out the “back door?” Why not try to keep the ones we have? Sometimes I feel that if we could count time for hospitality and visiting the sick and elderly, at least these things wouldn’t be such rare commodities. And yet true Christians should recognize the vital role these play in our worship. The root of the problems as far as I can see is that Witnesses desire to be “kept in line” by rules and “guidelines”, and not by love. The average Witness has not learned to reason and to think on scripture. He has not grasped the mind of Christ, nor does he appreciate the fact that Christ “set us free” from such laws. Witnesses prefer to say, “The Society says…” and view such written statements as Law and a basis for judging their brothers. This is sadly reminiscent of the Pharisaical mentality of Jesus’ day. People feel burdened down, tired and disillusioned. This is not consistent with the “refreshment Christ offered when he said at Matthew 11:28-30:
There are those who have said of me that I must somehow “be looking for an easy way out.” The statement may have had some validity if I were trying to “get out” of my Christian responsibilities. The fact is that I am simply trying to more fully live up to my Christian obligations. I realize that I must shed the shackles of an organization, which has now become a hindrance to my doing so. As for this being an “easy” way out, is it really an easy way out to lose everyone you have ever known, your family and friends for something you believe in? This is though, the Christian course we all have committed to. I have shown today, by this letter, that I am committed fully to God and Christ. I have now given up all things to follow him, short of my life. (Mark 10:28-31) For the most part, I have few regrets. I do thank the organization for directing me to God’s word, and teaching me basic bible truths, helping me to appreciate the benefits of living a clean and moral life. I thank them for helping me avoid the snares of materialism and the corruption of this system. I thank them for the encouragement to stand up for what is right, no matter what the majority choose to do. I thank them for highlighting the importance of verifying “truth” with that which is set forth in God’s Word, and following it no matter what the cost. I have learned invaluable lessons. I have learned that organized religion really is “a snare and a racket.” I have learned the truthfulness of Jesus words when he said, “no one knows the day or the hour,” and the importance of “keeping on the watch.” While, I am confident in my decision, it is made with a certain sadness. I remember the sadness I felt when people “left”. I remember asking myself if I could have done something to prevent them from leaving. I hope all of your consciences are clear, as those who know me well, know that I would not do anything such as this without full knowledge of the facts. I am not ignorant of Scripture, neither am I of the facts. There is nothing anyone could have said or done to prevent the course I have chosen. I am finally at peace as I have found the answer as to why things are the way they are in the organization, and why they are not as they should be. There is clarity of thought, which I possess these days, and while I cannot claim to have all the answers, I am willing to leave the rest in God’s hands. Finally, I wish to thank all of you. I am happy to have been able to leave on good terms in a wonderful hall, with perhaps the best group of elders that I have ever known. I hold no bitterness, nor anger toward any of you. Again, I understand the sadness felt when one leaves, and I understand the difficulty you will have comprehending my actions and why I have come to the conclusions I did. I know that you will feel that I have somehow been “over-reached” by “opposers”, or “worldly wisdom”. Whatever your conclusion regarding me you come to, I only hope when someone asks about me, you can say with confidence that although perhaps “misguided” I stood for something and Someone I believed in. I cannot say any more than what I have said. Whatever course you choose in life, I hope you too are happy in your service to our wonderful God and Father Jehovah and his son Jesus Christ.
Because of my love for, and supreme loyalty to Jehovah and his Son Christ Jesus, and my belief that the entire range of teachings of Jehovah’s Witnesses is not in complete harmony with those set forth in Scripture, and because I cannot in good conscience accept certain teachings which have no basis in Scripture, I hereby formally disassociate myself from the religion known as Jehovah’s Witnesses. In Christian Love and freedom, Brother X One
quote credit from: Camryn of H20 Back to "Leaving the Jehovah's Witnesses"
|